Jones v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 98

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/25/2010 ORDERING this matter is reassigned to the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. The parties shall take note that all documents filed hereafter with the Clerk shall bear case number 2:09-cv-1025 DAD. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Shubb are vacated.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
Jones v. County of Sacramento et al Doc. 98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendant. ___________________________/ Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge." See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the DRAKE S. JONES, Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-09-1025 WBS DAD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge. The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. /// /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number CIV-S-09-1025 DAD. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Shubb are hereby VACATED. DATED: October 25, 2010 H a v i n g also reviewed the file, I accept reference of t h i s case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. DATED: October 26, 2010. Ddad1\orders.consent\jones1025.consent

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?