Wick v. Angelea et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/17/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 94 Findings and Recommendations. 88 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendants Monroe, Mejia, and Grannis, and DENIED as to defendant Anglea. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC WICK, 12 No. 2:09-cv-1027-GEB-EFB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ANGLEA, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 11, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 26 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 11, 2014, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 88) is granted in favor of 4 defendants Monroe, Mejia, and Grannis, and denied as to defendant Anglea. 5 Dated: March 17, 2014 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?