Duff v. Solano County Sheriff's Department

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/12/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 38 are adopted in full; Defendant Villasenor's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to plaintiff's allegations against this defendant is granted, and defendant Villasenor is dismissed from this action. See Local Rule 110. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Duff v. Solano County Sheriff's Department Doc. 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 19, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAIMEY L. DUFF, Plaintiff, vs. No. CIV S-09-1053 LKK GGH P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 19, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Defendant Villasenor's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to plaintiff's allegations against this defendant is granted, and defendant Villasenor is dismissed from this action. See Local Rule 110. DATED: July 12, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?