Holloway v. Sisto

Filing 10

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/19/09 recommending that petitioner's request 8 be granted and that this action be dismissed without prejudice. MOTION to DISMISS 8 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, Defendants. / Petitioner is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a denial of parole. On August 20, 2009, an inmate purporting to act on petitioner's behalf filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that petitioner had been paroled. On October 1, 2009, this court directed petitioner to inform the court whether he wished to proceed with this action and warned him that failure to respond would result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. He has not responded to the order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner's request (docket no. 8) be granted and that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 1 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIE HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff, No. CIV 09-1088 MCE KJM P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: November 19, 2009. 2 holl1088.41(b) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?