Diamond v. Mediterranean Shipping Company, et al,
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/10/10 ORDERING plf's request for production of documents 94 is DISREGARDED; and the docket entry 94 shall be AMENDED to reflect that the document is a request for production of documents and that it is disregarded. (Carlos, K)
(PS) Diamond v. Mediterranean Shipping Company, et al,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARTHUR DIAMOND, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has filed a copy of a request for production of documents. The filing of discovery requests and responses is prohibited unless and until there is a proceeding in which a discovery document is at issue. See Local Rules 250.2(c), 250.3(c), 250.4(c) & 250.5(d). The docket entry for plaintiff's November 1, 2010 filing (Doc. No. 94) shall be amended to reflect that the document is a request for production of documents, and the request will be disregarded. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 10, 2010. No. CIV S-09-1110 MCE DAD PS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?