Diamond v. Mediterranean Shipping Company, et al,

Filing 100

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/10/10 ORDERING plf's request for production of documents 94 is DISREGARDED; and the docket entry 94 shall be AMENDED to reflect that the document is a request for production of documents and that it is disregarded. (Carlos, K)

(PS) Diamond v. Mediterranean Shipping Company, et al,

Doc. 100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:kw Ddad1\orders.prose\diamond1110.ord.discdocs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARTHUR DIAMOND, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has filed a copy of a request for production of documents. The filing of discovery requests and responses is prohibited unless and until there is a proceeding in which a discovery document is at issue. See Local Rules 250.2(c), 250.3(c), 250.4(c) & 250.5(d). The docket entry for plaintiff's November 1, 2010 filing (Doc. No. 94) shall be amended to reflect that the document is a request for production of documents, and the request will be disregarded. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 10, 2010. No. CIV S-09-1110 MCE DAD PS

ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com