Diamond v. Mediterranean Shipping Company, et al,

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/24/09 ORDERING that Defendant's Motions to Compel were granted in part and the Motion for Sanctions was DENIED. Plaintiff shall supplement his responses within fourteen days of the date of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Ddad1/orders.civil/diamond1110.oah.082409 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARTHUR DIAMOND, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / This case came before the court on August 14, 2009, for hearing of defendant's motions to compel further responses to a request for production of documents (Doc. No. 26), to compel further responses to special interrogatories (Doc. No. 29) and for sanctions. The pro se plaintiff appeared on his own behalf. Cherie Sutherland appeared on behalf of the moving defendant. For the reasons set forth on the record at the hearing, defendant's motions to compel were granted in part and the motion for sanctions was denied. Plaintiff shall supplement his responses within fourteen days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 24, 2009. ORDER No. CIV S-09-1110 MCE DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?