Guevara v. Ralls et al
Filing
101
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/10/11 ordering within 21 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause, if any he has why his claims against defendant A. Ralls are not barred under Heck v. Humphrey. Defendant Ralls shall file a reply, if any, 7 days thereafter. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
AMILCAR GUEVARA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. 2:09-cv-1132 FCD KJN P
A. RALLS, et al.,
14
15
16
Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On May 4, 2011, this
17
court issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s excessive force claims
18
against defendants Scruggs, Ramirez and McCarvel be barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512
19
U.S. 477 (1994). It appears that plaintiff’s claims against defendant A. Ralls are also based on
20
facts implicating plaintiff’s conviction for Resisting Staff Resulting in the Use of Force for rules
21
violation Log No. C07-04-101, stemming from the April 30, 2007 incident, and thus are similarly
22
barred under Heck. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause, if any he may have, why his
23
claims against defendant Ralls are not also barred under Heck, and why, in light of the Heck bar,
24
this action should not be dismissed without prejudice.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause,
1
1
if any he has, why his claims against defendant A. Ralls are not barred under Heck v. Humphrey,
2
512 U.S. 477 (1994); and
3
4
2. Defendant Ralls shall file a reply, if any, seven days thereafter.
DATED: May 10, 2011
5
6
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
guev1132.osc
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?