Bernardini v. Walker et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 2/2/2010 ORDERING that the 17 Findings and Recommendations filed November 16, 2009, are ADOPTED. Defendants Cate, Schwarzenegger, and Walker are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ On November 16, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RUSSELL BERNARDINI, Plaintiff, CIV-S-09-1134 FCD GGH PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 16, 2009, are ADOPTED; and 2. Defendants Cate, Schwarzenegger, and Walker are dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: February 2, 2010. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?