Nugent v. Vacaville Christian School, et al.,

Filing 10

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/18/2009 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice re 1 Complaint filed by Andrew James Nugent. Objections to F&R due w/in 10 days. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 VACAVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. / By order filed June 1, 2009, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. Plaintiff has been granted three extensions of time, but he has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given in the June 1, 2009, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREW JAMES NUGENT, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1154 MCE GGH PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: December 18, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 n u g e n t 1 1 5 4 . f ta 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?