ING Bank, fsb v. Fazah

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/2/09 ORDERING that the proposed findings and recommendations filed 11/16/09, are ADOPTED; Defendant's motion to dismiss, 7 is denied; and Defendant is directed to file an answer within fourteen (14) days of this order. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. RAMON P. FAZAH, Defendant. __________________________________/ ORDER ING BANK, fsb, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. CIV S-09-1174 WBS EFB PS On November 16, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed findings and recommendations in full. \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The proposed findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2009, are ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 7, is denied; and 3. Defendant is directed to file an answer within fourteen (14) days1 of this order. DATED: December 2, 2009 See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, effective December 1, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?