Sanchez v. Indymac Bank, FSB, et al.

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/23/2010 ORDERING that without opposition, Freddie Mac's 59 Motion to Intervene is hereby GRANTED. The Court declines to immediately adopt movant's proposed Motion to Expunge but does grant leave to file said motion by way of regular motion practice as outlined by Local Rules.(Duong, D)

Download PDF
Sanchez v. Indymac Bank, FSB, et al. Doc. 66 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Presently before the Court is a Motion by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") seeking to intervene in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2). Freddie Mac is the current owner of property located at 485 Ribier Court, Manteca, County of San Joaquin, California, which was purchased at a trustee's sale that took place on September 17, 2009 following default by Plaintiff Donald Sanchez ("Plaintiff") on a mortgage loan secured by the property. /// /// 1 ----oo0oo---v. INDYMAC BANK, FSB, et al., Defendants. DONALD SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER No. 2:09-cv-01186-MCE-GGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Freddie Mac seeks to intervene for the purpose of filing a Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens which it alleges Plaintiff improperly recorded against the property. Plaintiff has filed a Statement of Non-Opposition in which it opposes the allegation of improper recordation but does not oppose the grant of the Motion to Intervene. Without opposition, Freddie Mac's Motion to Intervene (Docket No. 59) is hereby GRANTED.1 The Court declines to immediately adopt movant's proposed Motion to Expunge but does grant leave to file said motion by way of regular motion practice as outlined by Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2010 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Because oral argument will not be of material assistance, the Court deemed this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 230 (g). 2 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?