Andreozzi v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/10 ORDERING that The FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/4/10 18 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants California Medical Facility Vacaville; B Cocaran; Garcia; S Jimenez; D Mobley; Pudding; J Richard; M Beais and California Department of Corrections are DISMISSED from this action. This Action shall proceed against defendant Lesane only. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On May 4, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. /// /// 1 vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., LEROY ARTHER ANDREOZZI, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-09-1192-JAM-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The findings and recommendations filed May 4, 2010, are adopted in full; The following defendants are dismissed from this action as the amended complaint fails to state a claim against them: California Department of Corrections, California Medical Facility Vacaville, M. Beais, B. Cocaran, J. Richard, Pudding, S. Jimenez, Garcia, and D. Mobley; and 3. This action shall proceed against defendant Lesane only. DATED: June 17, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?