United States of America v. Lawton-Greitzer

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/4/09: the counsel for pltf is directed to notice the Motion for Entry of Judgment 8 before Magistrate Dale A. Drozd for hearing on a regularly scheduled law and motion calendar in keeping with Local Rule 78-230(b) and to serve the filed notice of motion on dft. (Carlos, K)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Motions for entry of default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) are also referred to the magistrate judge. Local Rule 72-302(c)(19). 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAURI LAWTON-GREITZER, D.C., Defendant. / Plaintiff has filed a complaint for judgment against the defendant on defaulted student loans. The proceeding has been referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 72-302(c)(16). Before the court is plaintiff's motion for entry of judgment (Doc. No. 8) filed on July 7, 2009. Plaintiff's motion appears to have been brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)1 but has not been noticed for hearing. Local Rule 78-230(b). Counsel for plaintiff will be directed to notice the motion for hearing before the undersigned on a regularly scheduled law ///// ///// ORDER No. CIV S-09-1234 GEB DAD

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

and motion calendar in keeping with the above cited rule and to serve the filed notice of motion on defendant.2 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 4, 2009.

DAD:kw ddad1\orders.civil\lawtongreitzer.ord.mdj

Plaintiff has already served its motion, supporting declaration and proposed judgment on plaintiff. However, the court would request that counsel for plaintiff be prepared to address at the hearing, or prior thereto by filing a supplemental memorandum served on defendant, the damages sought by plaintiff in a sum certain as well as the computation by which that sum was arrived at. 2

2