Bledea et al v. Indymac Federal Bank et al

Filing 85

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/4/2010 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The clerk of the court is directed to CLOSE this case. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 NO. CIV. S-09-1239 LKK/GGH 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. ORDER INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, MORTGAGEIT, INC., MARIPOSA MORTGAGE, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., MARIO BURNIAS, JOSE LUIS CALLEJA, BIC D. PHO and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. / On April 30, 2010, the court filed an order noting that because plaintiffs' operative complaint contained no federal causes of action, it appeared that the court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. The court granted the parties fourteen (14) days to file briefing as to why this court should retain suit, and explained that "If no such brief is filed, the court will dismiss this suit without 1 Plaintiffs, GHEORGE BLEDEA and ELISABETA BLEDEA, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction." This period expired on May 14, 2010. Plaintiffs filed a statement indicating their non-opposition to dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No other response was filed. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 4, 2010. The clerk of the court is directed to CLOSE this 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?