Harvel v. Owens Healthcare - Retail Pharmacy, Inc.

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 09/18/09 ORDERING that the hearing on the 16 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 11/04/09 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email laborlawyer@pacbell.net www.laborlawyer.net 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mark R. Thierman Cal SB# 72913 THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89511 Tel: (775) 284-1500 Scott A. Miller, Esq., SB # 230322 LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT A. MILLER A Professional Corporation 16133 Ventura Blvd. Suite 1200 Encino, CA 91436 Tel. (818) 788-8081 Steven L. Miller, Esq., SB # 106023 LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. MILLER A Professional Corporation 16133 Ventura Blvd. Suite 1200 Encino, CA 91436 Tel. (818) 986-8900 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SACRAMENTO DIVISION LISA LYNN HARVEL, on behalf of herself, ) all others similarly situated and the general ) public, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) OWENS HEALTHCARE ­ RETAIL ) PHARMACY, INC., a California corporation, ) and as FIDUCIARY OF THE OWENS ) HEALTHCARE ­ RETAIL PHARMACY, ) INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN, and ) DOES 1-50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) Case No.: 2:09-cv-01249-JAM-GGH STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING Complaint Filed: April 30, 2009 Trial Date: None Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(g), Plaintiff LISA LYNN HARVEL ("Plaintiff"), individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, and Defendant OWENS 1 Stipulation for Continuance of Hearing 1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com HEALTHCARE-RETAIL PHARMACY, INC. ("Defendant"), by and through their 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email laborlawyer@pacbell.net www.laborlawyer.net 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 counsel of record, request that this Court grant a continuance of the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss currently set for September 23, 2009 to November 4, 2009. This continuance is requested to allow the parties time to finalize a settlement agreement that will result in resolution of Plaintiff's claims and obviate the need for this matter to be heard. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 17, 2009. THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC By: /s/Mark R. Thierman MARK R. THIERMAN Attorney for Plaintiff LISA LYNN HARVEL Dated: September 17, 2009. JACKSON LEWIS LLP By: /s/Jason M. Stein RENÉ E. THORNE (LA SBN 22875) JASON M. STEIN (LA SBN 30073) SUSANNE VETERS (LA SBN 2736) Jackson Lewis LLP 650 Poydras Street, Suite 1900 New Orleans, LA 70130 Telephone: (504) 208-1755 Facsimile: (504) 208-1759 BRENDAN J. BEGLEY (SBN 202563) 801 "K" Street, Suite 2300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 341-0404 Facsimile: (916) 341-0141 Attorneys for Defendant OWENS HEALTHCARE-RETAIL PHARMACY, INC. 1 Stipulation for Continuance of Hearing 2 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email laborlawyer@pacbell.net www.laborlawyer.net 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good reason appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 18, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 1 Stipulation for Continuance of Hearing 3 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email laborlawyer@pacbell.net www.laborlawyer.net 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 28 27 26 25 24 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?