Miller v. Grannis et al

Filing 18

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/01/10 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. GRANNIS, et al., Defendants. / On April 28, 2010, the Honorable Frank C. Damrell denied plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered plaintiff to pay the $350 filing fee within twenty-one days. Twenty-one days passed and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or otherwise respond to the April 28, 2010 order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ERNEST MILLER, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-1256 FCD KJN P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: June 1, 2010 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE mill1256.dis 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?