Dye v. Ramsey et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 09/14/09 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
/001; dye1289.fta
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM DYE, Plaintiff, vs. MIKE RAMSEY, et al., Defendants. / On June 8, 2009, plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed July 1, 2009, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: September 14, 2009. ORDER No. 2:09-cv-1289 JFM (PC)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
