Coats v. Fox et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/14/09 ordering that defendants Moore, McDonald, Swingle, Nepomuceno and Miranda, all claims against them, are dismissed from this action. This action shall proceed against defendant Fox only.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MICHAEL FOX, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and no other party has yet been served or appeared in the action. On October 28, 2009, the undersigned issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause in writing, within 30 days, why the claims against defendants Moore, McDonald, Swingle, Nepomuceno and Miranda should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to respond to the court's order may result in dismissal. To date, no response to that order has been received by the court. It therefore appears that Plaintiff agrees with the court's assessment that he fails to state a claim against defendants Moore, McDonald, Swingle, Nepomuceno and Miranda, and does not oppose those individuals being dismissed from 1 WILLIAM THOMAS COATES, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-09-1300-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Moore, McDonald, Swingle, Nepomuceno and Miranda, all claims against them, are dismissed from this action. This action shall proceed against defendant Fox only. DATED: December 14, 2009 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?