Dean v. Cavagnaro et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/24/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 46 are ADOPTED in FULL; Pltf's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED; and pltf is GRANTED 28 days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee of $350. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Dean v. Cavagnaro et al Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CAVAGNARO, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 27, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALTON E. DEAN, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-1339 MCE KJN P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 27, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked; and 3. Plaintiff is granted twenty-eight days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee ($350.00). Failure to pay the filing fee in full will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Dated: September 24, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?