Reece v. Carey et al
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/07/2011; Dfts Tom L. Carey, T. Holden and J.A. Nuehring are DISMISSED from this action; Dfts Jackson, R.J. Knudsen, Pia Laundry, J. LeGare, C. Martin, J. M artinez,, S. Schulke, CDCR Appeals Coordinator are terminated. Plaintiffs claims for due process violations relating to his prison disciplinary proceedings against all defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. This action shall proceed against defendant Dickenson only, on plaintiffs claim for denial of access to the court. (Michel, G) Modified on 7/8/2011 (Michel, G).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES G. REECE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
ORDER
TOM L. CAREY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
No. CIV S-09-1350-GEB-CMK-P
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
20
On May 2, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the
25
entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed May 2, 2011, are adopted in full;
3
2.
Plaintiff’s claims for due process violations relating to his prison
4
disciplinary proceedings against all defendants are dismissed without prejudice;
5
3.
Defendants Carey, Holden and Nuehring are dismissed from this action;
6
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate defendants LeGare,
7
Schulke, Martinez, Knudsen, Jackson, Martin, Laundry, and CDCR Appeals Coordinator as
8
defendants to this action as they are not named in plaintiff’s third amended complaint; and
9
5.
This action shall proceed against defendant Dickenson only, on plaintiff’s
10
claim for denial of access to the court.
11
Dated: July 7, 2011
12
13
14
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?