Johnston v. The City of Red Bluff, et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/24/2010 ORDERING 25 that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint consistent with the court's prior orders within 30 days of the date of this order. (Reader, L)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CITY OF RED BLUFF, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff brings this civil action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, against the City of Red Bluff and various of its employees. On February 18, 2010, the District Judge issued an order adopting the undersigned's findings and recommendations and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff appealed that order on March 18, 2010. On May 19, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because dismissal of a complaint with leave to amend is not an appealable order. Because the appeal has been dismissed, jurisdiction returns to this court which will now set a new deadline for plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the entire action. See Local Rule 110. 1 SCOTT JOHNSTON, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-09-1353-FCD-CMK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint consistent with the court's prior orders within 30 days of the date of this order.
DATED: May 24, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?