Brooks v. Haviland et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/13/11 DENYING 56 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RONALD BROOK,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

No. 2:09-cv-1364 GEB KJN (TEMP) P

J.W. HAVILAND, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

16
17

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

18

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

19

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

20

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

21

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

22

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff’s request for the

23

appointment of counsel is denied.

24

////

25

////

26

////
1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 8, 2011 request for

1
2

the appointment of counsel is denied.

3

DATED: July 13, 2011

4
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7

broo1364.31

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2