Brooks v. Haviland et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/1/2011 re 58 Motion for Reconsideration; ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, 57 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel is AFFIRMED. (Waggoner, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RONALD BROOK,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
J.W. HAVILAND, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB KJN (TEMP) P

ORDER
/

On July 26, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

17

judge’s order filed July 14, 2011, denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel.

18

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

19

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

20

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

21

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

22

magistrate judge filed July 14, 2011, is affirmed.

23

Dated: August 1, 2011

24
25
26

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge