Brooks v. Haviland et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/25/2012 ORDERING 70 that, upon reconsideration, the order # 69 of the Magistrate Judge filed 1/10/2012, is AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

RONALD BROOK,

9
10
11
12

Plaintiff,
vs.
V. SING, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P

ORDER
/

On January 17, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

15

judge’s order filed January 10, 2012, denying plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint.

16

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

17

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

18

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

19

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

20

magistrate judge filed January 10, 2012, is affirmed.

21

Dated: January 25, 2012

22
23
24
25
26

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge