Brooks v. Haviland et al

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/16/12 ADOPTING 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; Defendants' 48 April 11, 2011 motion for summary judgment is DENIED (Kaminski, H) Modified on 3/19/2012 (Meuleman, A).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD BROOK, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P V. SINGH, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On January 27, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2012, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ April 11, 2011 motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 48) is 3 denied. 4 Dated: March 16, 2012 5 6 7 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?