Rodgers v. Placer County Sheriff's Department

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/15/11 ORDERING that his action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES T. RODGERS, 11 Plaintiff, vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-1367 EFB P PLACER COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. 19 § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). 20 On September 20, 2011, the court dismissed plaintiff’s third amended complaint with 21 leave to amend. The dismissal order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 22 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure 23 to file an amended complaint may result in this action being dismissed. 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 2 The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 3 Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a 4 claim. 5 Dated: December 15, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?