Jones v. Jenkins et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/20/2012. Plaintiff shall inform Court within 30 days whether wishes his case to be re-opened, defendants to be served, and this matter to proceed. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
STEVEN JONES,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-09-1373 GGH P
vs.
CHRISTOPHER JENKINS, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
By order filed on August 20, 2009, this prisoner civil rights action proceeding on
16
plaintiff’s claims of excessive force against the defendants was dismissed without prejudice for
17
plaintiff’s failure to respond to the court’s order to complete and return the forms and documents
18
required for service to be effected upon the defendants. However, it has very belatedly come to
19
the court’s attention that plaintiff had, in fact, apparently timely submitted the required
20
documents for service, that is, in mail metered on June 22, 2009, in response to a June 10, 2009
21
order, but the prison failed to deliver the metered mail to the court until April 17, 2012.
22
Notwithstanding the fact that this action was dismissed on an erroneous premise,
23
plaintiff failed to so notify the court in any subsequent filing or to otherwise seek to proceed in
24
this case. Therefore, although more than two and half years have passed, plaintiff will now be
25
directed to inform the court whether he would like the instant case to be re-opened and for this
26
matter to proceed.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff inform this court within
2
thirty days whether he wishes for his case to be re-opened, defendants to be served and this
3
matter proceed.
4
DATED: April 20, 2012
5
6
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH:009
jone1373.ord
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?