Nike, Inc. v. Oshaish, et al.

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING referral of action to VDRP signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/25/10. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP ATTORNE Y S AT L A W UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION NIKE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MAZIN ABDULHAMID OSHAISH, an individual, and dba PHRESH FASHION, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 09-CV-01438-JAM-DAD ORDER GRANTING REFERRAL OF ACTION TO VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM (VDRP) PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-271 Having reviewed the Stipulation to Elect Referral of Action to Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP) Pursuant To Local Rule 16-271 of the parties herein, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Local Rule 16-271, the action is hereby referred to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP) pursuant to the following conditions: (1) that any settlement attempts pursuant to the Program be completed by August 12, 2010; (2) that Plaintiff's representative for settlement purposes be available by telephone and is 7E3F7436.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 09-CV-01438 JAM DAD PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP ATTORNE Y S AT L A W excused from personal attendance at any settlement attempt pursuant to the Program; and (3) that Defendant's deposition proceed the following day after any failed settlement attempt pursuant to the Program, and in no event later than August 13, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 25, 2010 s/ John A. Mendez___________________ Honorable John A. Mendez U.S. District Court Judge 7E3F7436.doc -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 09-CV-01438 JAM DAD PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?