Singh, et al v. Sacramento County, et al

Filing 113

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/15/2012 ORDERING that Defendant Peter Dietrich be, and hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice forthwith. Each side to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. (Zignago, K.)

1

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES

2

2180 Harvard Street, Suite 310
Sacramento, California 95815

3

Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]

4

Jesse M. Rivera, CSN 84259
Shanan L. Hewitt, CSN 200168
Jonathan B. Paul, CSN 215884

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant,
PETER DIETRICH

7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

15

Estate of BALJIT SINGH, deceased, by and
through PRABJIT SINGH DHANDA,
JASJIT KAUR DHANDA, SUKHJIT
KAUR DHANDA and DAVANJIT SINGH
DHANDA (minors through their mother and
guardian ad litem Amarjit Singh) and
AMARJIT SINGH as successors in interest;
PRABJIT SINGH DHANDA, Individually;
JASJIT KAUR DHANDA, Individually,
DAVANJIT SINGH DHANDA,
Individually; and AMARJIT SINGH,
Individually,

16

vs.

17

27

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
Sacramento County Sheriff JOHN
MCGINNESS; Sacramento County Main
Jail Commander SCOTT JONES;
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department
Chief of Correctional and Court Services
JAMIE LEWIS; Sacramento County Chief
of Correctional Health Services
ANNMARIE BOYLAN; Sacramento
County Jail System Medical Director DR.
PETER DIETRICH; UC Davis Department
of Psychiatry Chair DR. ROBERT HALES;
Clinical Director of Jail Psychiatric Services
PAUL HENDRICKS; Medical Director of
Jail Psychiatric Services DR. GREGORY
SOKOLOV; L. MICHAEL TOMPKINS;
DONNA L. CHAMPEAU; and DOES 1 to
40,
Defendants.
/

28

_____________________________________________________________________________

10
11
12
13
14

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CASE NO.:

2:09-cv-01439 JAM JFM

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)]

Plaintiffs,

Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)

Page 1

1

It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by

2

and between the plaintiffs Estate of BALJIT SINGH, deceased, by and through PRABJIT SINGH

3

DHANDA, JASJIT KAUR DHANDA, SUKHJIT KAUR DHANDA and DAVANJIT SINGH

4

DHANDA (minors through their mother and guardian ad litem Amarjit Singh) and AMARJIT

5

SINGH as successors in interest; PRABJIT SINGH DHANDA, Individually; JASJIT KAUR

6

DHANDA, Individually, DAVANJIT SINGH DHANDA, Individually; and AMARJIT SINGH,, and

7

defendant PETER DIETRICH, individually and in his official capacity, by and through his attorney,

8

Jesse M. Rivera, that Defendant PETER DIETRICH be dismissed with prejudice forthwith. Each

9

side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.

10
11

Dated: June 15, 2012

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ

12
/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13
14
15
16

Dated: June 15, 2012

LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH C. GEORGE

17
/s/ Joseph C. George, Sr.
JOSEPH C. GEORGE, SR.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: June 15, 2012

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
/s/ Van Longyear
VAN LONGYEAR
Attorneys for Defendants,
County of Sacramento, John McGinness,
Scott Jones, Jamie Lewis, AnnMarie Boylan

26
27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)

Page 2

2

1

Dated: June 15, 2012

2

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Jesse M. Rivera
JESSE M. RIVERA
Attorneys for Defendant,
Peter Dietrich

3
4
5
6
7

Dated: June 15, 2012

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY,
LLP

8
/s/ Robert F. Tyler, Jr.
ROBERT F. TYLER, JR.
Attorneys for Defendants, Robert Hales,
Paul Hendricks, Gregory Sokolov, and

9
10
11

L. Michael Tompkins

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

The stipulation of the parties to dismiss Defendant PETER DIETRICH having been read
and considered,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant PETER DIETRICH be, and hereby is,
dismissed with prejudice forthwith. Each side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.

19
Dated: June 15, 2012

/s/ John A. Mendez________________________

20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)

Page 3

3