Singh, et al v. Sacramento County, et al

Filing 161

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/19/2012 ORDERING that the the presently set trial date of January 14, 2013 is VACATED. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 2/22/2013 at 10:00 a.m. The trial date is CONTINUED to 4/8/2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
Stewart Katz, SBN 127425
Guy Danilowitz, SBN 257733
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH C. GEORGE
Joseph C. George, Sr., SBN 119231
Joseph George, Jr., SBN 200999
601 University Ave, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
Van Longyear, SBN 84189
Jennifer Marquez, SBN 232194
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants,
County of Sacramento,
Scott Jones,

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD
& BIRNEY, LLP
Robert F. Tyler, SBN 063055
400 Capitol Mall, 22nd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants,
Robert Hales, Paul Hendricks, Gregory
Sokolov, and Dr. L. Michael Tompkins

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

Estate of BALJIT SINGH, et al.

17

Plaintiffs,

18

vs.

19
20
21

NO. 2:09-CV-01439-JAM-JFM

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

STIPULATION AND
ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER
[DOCUMENT 132]

Defendants.
___________________________________/

22
23

COME NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective parties and subject to

24

the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following

25

modifications and/or amendments to this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order of June 1, 2012

26

(Document 110), regarding the scheduling of this case:

27

•

That the presently set trial date of January 14, 2013 is vacated.

28

•

That the Final Pretrial Conference be heard on February 22, 2013 at 10:00 a.m..

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

1

1

•

2

This calendaring modification is requested because of limited time between the

3

completion of the extensive arguments regarding the motions for summary judgment and

4

the January 14, 2013 trial date and the trial calendars of the Court and the parties.

That the trial date be April 8, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

5

The Court’s initial PTSO, Docket # 30 regarding the timing of the joint pretrial

6

statement, the marking and identification of exhibits and other matter relating to trial shall

7

remain effect and be followed by the parties in relation to the new pretrial conference and

8

trial dates.

9
10

Dated: November 16, 2012

11

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

12
13
14

Dated: November 16, 2012

LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH C. GEORGE
/s/ Joseph C. George, Sr.
JOSEPH C. GEORGE, SR.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

15
16
17
18

Dated: November 16, 2012

19

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
/s/ Van Longyear
VAN LONGYEAR
Attorneys for Defendants,
County of Sacramento, John McGinness,
Scott Jones, Jamie Lewis, AnnMarie Boylan

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 16, 2012

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD &
BIRNEY, LLP
/s/ Robert F. Tyler, Jr.
ROBERT F. TYLER, JR.
Attorneys for Defendants, Robert Hales,
Paul Hendricks, Gregory Sokolov, and
L. Michael Tompkins

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

2

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4

Dated: 11/19/2012

/s/ John A. Mendez___________
The Honorable John A. Mendez
Judge of the U.S. District Court

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

3