Singh, et al v. Sacramento County, et al

Filing 221

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/17/2013 DISMISSING Defendants Robert Hales, Paul Hendricks, Gregory Sokolov, L. Michael Tompkins; with prejudice; ORDERING all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
Stewart Katz, SBN 127425
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH C. GEORGE
Joseph C. George, Sr., SBN 119231
Joseph George, Jr., SBN 200999
601 University Ave, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17

Estate of BALJIT SINGH, et al.
Plaintiffs,
vs.

18

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

19

NO. 2:09-CV-01439-JAM-JFM

Defendants.
___________________________________/

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

COME NOW, Plaintiffs, Estate of BALJIT SINGH, deceased, by and through
PRABJIT SINGH DHANDA, JASJIT KAUR DHANDA, SUKHJIT KAUR DHANDA and
DAVANJIT SINGH DHANDA (minors through their mother and guardian ad litem Amarjit
Singh) and AMARJIT SINGH as successors in interest; PRABJIT SINGH DHANDA,
Individually; JASJIT KAUR DHANDA, Individually; SUKHJIT KAUR DHANDA,
Individually; DAVANJIT SINGH DHANDA, Individually; and AMARJIT SINGH,
Individually; and Defendants DR. ROBERT HALES, PAUL HENDRICKS, DR. GREGORY
SOKOLOV, and L. MICHAEL TOMPKINS, and through their counsel stipulate that this

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

1

matter may be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

2

Procedure, of any and all claims, in consideration of settlement payment from DR. ROBERT

3

HALES, PAUL HENDRICKS, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, and L. MICHAEL TOMPKINS

4

for amount satisfactory to Plaintiffs and as to the minor Plaintiffs with the approval of the

5

Court.

6

Each party to bear his, her or its own costs and attorneys’ fees, including any

7

entitlement to fees or costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988. The parties therefore

8

stipulate that this matter may be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to defendants

9

DR. ROBERT HALES, PAUL HENDRICKS, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, and L.

10

MICHAEL TOMPKINS.

11
12

Dated: September 11, 2013

13

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

14
15
16

Dated: September 11, 2013

LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH C. GEORGE

17
/s/ Joseph C. George, Sr.
JOSEPH C. GEORGE, SR.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

18
19
20
21

Dated: September 15, 2013

22

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD &
BIRNEY, LLP
/s/ Robert F. Tyler, Jr.
ROBERT F. TYLER, JR.
Attorneys for Defendants,
DR. ROBERT HALES, PAUL HENDRICKS;
DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV; L. MICHAEL
TOMPKINS

23
24
25
26
27

///

28

///

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

1

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED. This entire action is dismissed with prejudice as to defendants DR.

4

ROBERT HALES, PAUL HENDRICKS, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, and L. MICHAEL

5

TOMPKINS. All parties to bear his, her, or its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

6
7

Dated: 9/17/2013

/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

3