Dobson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/24/12 ORDERING that the 11/15/12 hearing on Plaintiff's MOTION for Attorney's fees is VACATED; Plaintiff shall file any reply in support of his Motion no later than 11/8/2012, after which the Motion will be submitted on the record. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAVID R. DOBSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:09-cv-01460 KJN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
On September 25, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees under the
17
Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), noticed for hearing on
18
November 15, 2012. (Dkt. No. 36.) On October 23, 2012, the Commissioner filed an opposition
19
to plaintiff’s motion and a request that the matter be submitted on the briefing. (Dkt. No. 37.)
20
Having reviewed the record, the court finds that oral argument would not be of
21
material assistance in determining the pending motion. Therefore, the court will not entertain
22
oral argument, and will determine the motion on the record. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). If the
23
court subsequently concludes that oral argument may be necessary, it will set a hearing at such
24
time.
25
26
However, plaintiff will be permitted to file a reply to the Commissioner’s
opposition in accordance with this order.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The November 15, 2012 hearing on plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees is
3
4
5
6
7
VACATED.
2. Plaintiff shall file any reply in support of his motion no later than November 8,
2012, after which the motion will be submitted on the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 24, 2012
8
9
10
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?