Chappell v. Perez et al

Filing 16

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/22/10 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Objections to these F&Rs due w/i 21 days; referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Benson, A.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. T. PEREZ, et al., Defendants. / By order February 18, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and he was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 1 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REX CHAPPELL, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-1465 GEB KJN P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 22, 2010

_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
chap1465.dsm

2