Asberry v. Cate et al

Filing 80

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/29/13 ORDERING that this action proceeds only against defendant Phelps. Defendant Phelps motion for summary judgment, filed December 3, 2012 (Dkt. No. 73 ), is now fully briefed (see Dkt. No s. 76 , 79 ); also pending is plaintiffs request for judicial assistance to obtain further evidence in support of his opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 75 ). These matters are now submitted and will each be addressed in due course.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONY ASBERRY, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-01494 MCE KJN P vs. MATHEW CATE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 The parties have filed a joint stipulation dismissing defendant Hernandez from 17 this action. (Dkt. Nos. 77, 78.) As a result, this action proceeds only against defendant Phelps. 18 Defendant Phelps’ motion for summary judgment, filed December 3, 2012 (Dkt. No. 73), is now 19 fully briefed (see Dkt. Nos. 76, 79); also pending is plaintiff’s request for judicial assistance to 20 obtain further evidence in support of his opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment 21 (Dkt. No. 75). These matters are now submitted and will each be addressed in due course. 22 23 SO ORDERED. DATED: January 29, 2013 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 asbe1494..misc 26 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?