Watts v. Ramos, et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/18/11 ordering plaintiff's requests 29 , 31 are hereby granted. The parties may conduct discovery until 07/20/11. All discovery requests must be served by this date, with any motions to compel filed within 60 days of this date. Dispositive motions shall be filed by 11/21/11. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY WATTS, 12 No. CIV S-09-1515-KJM-CMK-P Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 R. RAMOS, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are the parties’ separate requests (Docs. 29 and 19 31) for modification of the scheduling order to allow additional time for discovery and filing of 20 dispositive motions.1 Good cause appearing therefor, the requests are granted. Discovery is 21 hereby re-opened. The parties may conduct discovery until July 20, 2011. All discovery requests 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 1 26 In his request, plaintiff also seeks reconsideration of the court’s December 17, 2010, order. That portion of plaintiff’s request will be addressed by separate order. 1 1 must be served by this date, with any motions to compel filed within 60 days of this date. 2 Dispositive motions shall be filed by November 21, 2011. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 DATED: May 18, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?