Stephen v. Zhang et al

Filing 77

ORDER ADOPTING 67 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/10/2010. Plaintiff's 53 Request for Order directing prison authorities to provide typewriter ribbons, interpreted as Request for Injunctive Relief, is DENIED. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Stephen v. Zhang et al Doc. 77 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. F. ZHANG, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On November 10, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. /// /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JIMMIE STEPHEN, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-01516-MCE-KJM P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 10, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff's request for an order directing prison authorities to provide typewriter ribbons (Docket No. 53), interpreted as a request for injunctive relief is denied. Dated: December 10, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?