West v. Daniels et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/15/10 DENYING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee in full within 20 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(PC) West v. Daniels et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. R. DANIELS, et al., Defendants. / ORDER JOHN E. WEST, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. CIV S 09-1532 EFB P Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). On April 19, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had, on three prior occasions, brought actions in a court of the United States that were dismissed on the ground that they were frivolous, malicious or failed to state a claim. The court also found that plaintiff had not demonstrated that he was "under imminent danger of serious physical injury," 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), so that he nonetheless could proceed in forma pauperis. The court gave plaintiff thirty days either to make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The 20-day period has expired and plaintiff has failed to make the requisite showing or otherwise respond to the court's order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; and 2. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee in full within 20 days. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this case. DATED: July 15, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?