Hill v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 82

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/24/2010 GRANTING extension of time for Dfts to file a reply brief to Pltf's opposition to motion for summary judgment and/or summary adjudication. (Zignago, K.)

Hill v. County of Sacramento et al

Doc. 82

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GREGORY P. O'DEA, CSB No. 110966 AMANDA L. BUTTS CSB No. 253651 Longyear, O'Dea and Lavra, LLP 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, Ca. 95864 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ROGER DICKINSON, ROBERTA MACGLASHAN, SUSAN PETERS, JIMMIE YEE, DON NOTTOLI, SACRAMENTO AIRPORT SYSTEM, and G. HARDY ACREE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

ANN HILL, Plaintiff v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ROGER DICKINSON, ROBERTA MACGLASHAN, SUSAN PETERS, JIMMIE YEE, DON NOTTOLI, SACRAMENTO AIRPORT SYSTEM, and G. HARDY ACREE Defendants. _____________________________________

L O N G Ye3eAh oAmerican974-8500 95864-5923 [phone] T E 6p 0 , e (916) eeRta&LCA /V RSuite 230 l 2 R n Oa't troarm A io ,e ra Drive, A , L L P S AcD E yn v L A Facsimile n st w

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-01565-GEB-GGH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [L.R. 143 & 144] Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: September 27, 2010 9:00 a.m. 3 Hon. Garland e. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN Defendants, County of Sacramento, Roger Dickinson, Roberta MacGlashan, Susan Peters, Jimmie Yee, Don Nottoli, Sacramento Airport System, and G. Hardy Acree, by and through their attorneys, Gregory P. O'Dea and Amanda L. Butts of Longyear, O'Dea & Lavra, LLP, and Plaintiff, Ann Hill, by and through her attorney, Anthony T. Caso of the Law Offices of Anthony T. Caso, that due to the Labor Day holiday on September 6, 2010, the last day for Defendants to file and serve a reply brief to Plaintiff's opposition to the Motions for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication is Tuesday, September 7,
S t i p u l a t i o n and [Proposed] Order for Extension of Time for Defendants to File a Reply Brief to Plaintiff's O p p o s itio n to Motion for Summary Judgment And/or Summary Adjudication P age: 1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2010. When preparing and filing the previous stipulation (Dkt. 78) extending Plaintiff's time to file an opposition to the Motions for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication Defense counsel overlooked that the deadline for their reply brief is on a federal holiday. Additionally, counsel for Defendants will be out of town on a previously scheduled and paid for vacation from September 3-6, 2010. The extension of time consists of one (1) additional day. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATE: August 20, 2010

LONGYEAR, O'DEA AND LAVRA, LLP /s/ Amanda L. Butts By: ___________________________________ GREGORY P. O'DEA AMANDA L. BUTTS Attorneys for County of Sacramento et al.

DATE: August 20, 2010

LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY T. CASO By: /s/ Anthony T. Caso ________________________________ ANTHONY T. CASO Attorney for Plaintiff Ann Hill

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2010

L O N G Ye3eAh oAmerican974-8500 95864-5923 [phone] T E 6p 0 , e (916) eeRta&LCA /V RSuite 230 l 2 R n Oa't troarm A io ,e ra Drive, A , L L P S AcD E yn v L A Facsimile n st w

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

S t i p u l a t i o n and [Proposed] Order for Extension of Time for Defendants to File a Reply Brief to Plaintiff's O p p o s itio n to Motion for Summary Judgment And/or Summary Adjudication P age: 2