Warner v. Cate et al

Filing 43

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/27/11 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed 5/17/11, is AFFIRMED. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EARL WARNER,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

vs.
MATTHEW L. CATE, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

15
16

No. CIV S-09-1568 KJM EFB P

On June 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

17

judge’s order filed May 17, 2011, denying plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel.

18

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

19

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

20

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

21

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

22

the magistrate judge filed May 17, 2011, is affirmed.

23

DATED: July 27, 2011.

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
1