Dumas v. City of Elk Grove et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/25/10 MODIFYING the #17 Pre-Trial Scheduling Order as follows: expert witness disclosures due by 5/17/10. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Michael W. Pott, SBN 186156 Derek J. Haynes, SBN 264621 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 mpott@porterscott.com dhaynes@porterscott.com Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ELK GROVE, CHRISTOPHER DIAZ, ALI KHALIL, LANCE MCDANIEL, WALLY SMITH, and ROBERT SIMMONS Stewart Katz, SBN 127425 LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 555 University Avenue, Suite 270 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: (916) 444-5678, ext. 13 FAX: (916) 444-3364 knvsback@earthlink.net Attorney for Plaintiff TAMARA DUMAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAMARA DUMAS; RICK DUMAS; KATELIN DUMAS; and KIMBERLY DUMAS; Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF ELK GROVE; Elk Grove Police Officer CHRISTOPHER DIAZ (Badge #127); Elk Grove Police Officer ALI KHALIL (Badge #164); Elk Grove Police Officer LANCE MCDANIEL (Badge #158), Elk Grove Police Sergeant WALLY SMITH (Badge #23), Elk Grove Police Chief ROBERT SIMMONS; and DOES1 through 20; inclusive, Defendants. ____________________________________/ {00761680.DOC} CASE NO. 2:09-cv-01573-GEB-JFM ORDER REGARDING THE STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY THE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER Complaint Filed: 06/08/2009 First Amended Complaint File: 8/27/09 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY THE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER The Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order is modified as the parties' request as follows: Expert Witness Disclosure: May 17, 2010 Any contradictory and/or rebuttal disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii): June 14, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 2/25/10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge {00761680.DOC} 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY THE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?