Dumas v. City of Elk Grove et al

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/19/10: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/29/2010. Discovery due by 1/31/2011. Dispositive Motions filed by 3/7/2011. Trial set for 6/21/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/9/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. Status conference scheduled on November 1, 2010 is vacated. (Kaminski, H)

Dumas v. City of Elk Grove et al

Doc. 37

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAMARA DUMASTAMARA DUMAS; RICK DUMAS; KATELIN DUMAS; and KIMBERLY DUMAS, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ELK GROVE; Elk Grove Police Officer CHRISTOPHER DIAZ (Badge #127); Elk Grove Police Officer ALI KHALIL (Badge #164); Elk Grove Police Officer LANCE MCDANIEL (Badge #158), Elk Grove Police Sergeant WALLY SMITH (Badge #23), Elk Grove Police Chief ROBERT SIMMONS, Defendants. ________________________________ This case is restored

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) to

2:09-cv-01573-GEB-JFM ORDER RESTORING CASE TO TRIAL DOCKET, REQUIRING INFORMATION ON MINORS' GUARDIAN AD LITEM, AND DISMISSING DOE DEFENDANTS

the

trial

calendar

since

notwithstanding the parties' previous representation that they settled this case, the Joint Status Report the parties filed on October 18, 2010, indicates the parties dispute whether this case is settled. Since most of the discovery in this action should have been completed when certain scheduled dates were vacated in response to the parties' representation that this action settled, and it is unclear how the referenced dispute will be resolved, the following scheduling order issues.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 calendar, vacated. Dated:

No further service, joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted, except with leave of Court, good cause having been shown. Moreover, the doe defendants are dismissed because of the reasoning indicated in the order setting status conference filed June 8, 2009; specifically, absent "specific information" showing the need for doe defendants, "Doe" defendants will be dismissed. (ECF No. 4.) All discovery shall be completed by January 31, 2011. Each party shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(c)(i)'s initial expert witness disclosure requirements on or before October 29, 2010, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) on or before November 30, 2010. The last hearing date for motions shall be March 7, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. The final pretrial conference is scheduled to commence at 1:30 p.m. on May 9, 2011. Trial shall commence at 9:00 a.m. on June 21, 2011. Further, counsel for the minor plaintiffs shall explain in a filing due within seven days of the date on which this order is filed whether each minor plaintiff has been appointed a guardian ad litem in this action. Lastly, the since this case has been restored on to the trial is

status

conference

scheduled

November

1, 2010

October 19, 2010

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2