Bardin v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al

Filing 38

DISMISSAL ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/29/10: Defendant AmericaHomeKey is dismissed without prejudice from this case, and Plaintiff's claim under the Truth in Lending Act, which is only alleged against AmericaHomeKey, is also dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Dioe Defendants portion of this Order. 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM D. BARDIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTRYWIDE HOMELOANS, INC.; BAC ) HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, A ) SUBSIDIARY OF BANK OF AMERICA, NA; ) MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION ) SYSTEMS, INC.; US FUNDING GROUP, ) INC.; JOHN MORRIS,1 ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:09-cv-1593-GEB-KJM DISMISSAL ORDER On January 18, 2010 Plaintiff and Defendant AmericanHomeKey, Inc. filed a stipulation ("stipulation") to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") without prejudice. (See Docket No. 34). A proposed order was also filed on January 18, 2010, that appears to dismiss Plaintiff's FAC without prejudice; however, Plaintiff only intends to dismiss Defendant AmericanHomeKey, Inc. without prejudice since Plaintiff and other named Defendants filed a joint status report on the same day Plaintiff and Defendant AmericanHomeKey, Inc. filed their stipulated dismissal document. (See Docket No. 36). Therefore, in accordance with the stipulation, Defendant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AmericanHomeKey is dismissed without prejudice from this case, and Plaintiff's claim under the Truth in Lending Act, which is only alleged against AmericanHomeKey, is also dismissed without prejudice. Dated: January 29, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?