Thompson et al v. City of Redding et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/6/11; This action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its/his/her own fees and costs, including attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5

CAROLEE G. KILDUFF, ESQ., SBN 107232
PETER D. HALLORAN, ESQ., SBN 184025
KEVIN J. DEHOFF, ESQ. SBN 252106
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
Attorneys at Law
601 University Ave. Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]

6

Telecopier: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF REDDING, DEBORAH WRIGHT and WILLIAM NAGLE

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

) Case No.: 2:09-CV-01609-WBS-CMK
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
) [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
CITY OF REDDING, DEBORAH WRIGHT, )
WILLIAM NAGEL, and DOES 1 through 10, )
)
Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
E.J. THOMPSON, VALERY THOMPSON,
MIDSTATE PROPERTIES, VIOLET
MANOR and CEDARS ROAD, LLC,

19

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the entry of an

20

order dismissing this action in its entirety, with prejudice, which each party to bear its/his/her

21

own fees and costs, including all attorneys’ fees.
/s/ Michael A. Scheibli

22
23

Dated: December 5, 2011

24
25
26
27

///

28

________________________________________
Michael A. Scheibli
Attorney for Plaintiffs E.J. THOMPSON, VALERY
THOMPSON, MIDSTATE PROPERTIES,
VIOLET MANOR and CEDARS ROAD, LLC

///
///
-1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Dated: December 6, 2011

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

2

/s/ Peter D. Halloran
By:
CAROLEE G. KILDUFF
PETER D. HALLORAN
KEVIN J. DEHOFF
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF
REDDING, DEBORAH WRIGHT and
WILLIAM NAGEL

3
4
5
6
7

00056985

ORDER

8
9
10
11
12

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR,
IT HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to
bear its/his/her own fees and costs, including attorneys’ fees.

13
14

Dated: December 6, 2011

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

COURT:
CASE NO.
CASE NAME:

USDC, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2:09-CV-01609-WBS-CMK
Thompson, et al. v. City of Redding, et al.

3

PROOF OF SERVICE

4

I am a citizen of the United States, employed in the County of Sacramento, State of
California. My business address is 601 University Avenue, Suite 150, Sacramento, California
95825. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the above-entitled action.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

I am readily familiar with Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff’s practice for collection and
processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Pursuant to said
practice, each document is placed in an envelope, the envelope is sealed, the appropriate postage
is placed thereon and the sealed envelope is placed in the office mail receptacle. Each day’s mail
is collected and deposited in a U.S. mailbox at or before the close of each day’s business.
(Fed.R.Civ.Proc.5(a) and 4.1; USDC (E.D. CA) L.R. 5-135(a).)
On December 6, 2011, I caused the within STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER, the original of which was produced on recycled paper, to be served via

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

MAIL --Placed in the United States Mail at Sacramento, California in an envelope with postage
thereon fully prepaid addressed as follows:
Michael A. Scheibli, Esq.
1416 West Street
Redding, CA 96001
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose
direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
States of America that the above is true and correct.
Executed on December 6, 2011 at Sacramento, California.

21
22

/s/ Julie Kraus
Julie Kraus

23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER