Copia Claims v. Calif Infrastructure and Economic Dev. Bank

Filing 74

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/18/2010 ORDERING 73 Lead Plaintiff will file and serve its Second Amended Consolidated Complaint on or before 7/12/2010; Dfts will move to dismiss the SACC on or before 8/13/2010; L ead Pltf will file and serve any papers in opposition to Dfts' motion to dismiss the SACC on or before 9/10/2010; Dfts will file and serve any reply papers in support of their motion to dismiss on or before 10/1/2010; and a hearing on Dfts motion to dismiss the will be held on 10/18/2010 at 9:00 AM,, or at such other time as is convenient for the Court. (Reader, L)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KEVIN P. MUCK (CSB No. 120918) CATHERINE KEVANE (CSB No. 215501) FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION WILLIAM GEORGE, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK, a public instrumentality of the State of California and ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP, an entity, Defendants. Case No.: 2:09-CV-01610-GEB-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO

WHEREAS: 1. This case, an alleged class action asserting claims under Section 10(b) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed on June 10, 2009 [Docket No. 1], is subject to the requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"); 2. Under the PSLRA, all discovery and other proceedings (including initial disclosures

under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(a)) are stayed until and unless it is determined that the plaintiff can state a claim capable of surviving a motion to dismiss (15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3); Medhekar v. U.S. District Court, 99 F.3d 325, 328 (9th Cir. 1996)); 3. On September 15, 2009, the Court granted the motion of William George ("Lead 1
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-01610-GEB-KJN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING SACC AND RESPONSE THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff") to be appointed lead plaintiff [Docket No. 39]; 4. On December 28, 2009, Lead Plaintiff filed a First Amended Consolidated Complaint

("FACC") [Docket No. 52]; 5. On February 5, 2010, Defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the FACC [Docket

Nos. 57-62], and the Court signed a stipulation and order [Docket No. 56] pursuant to which that motion was set for hearing on April 5, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., or at such other time as is convenient for the Court; 6. On March 5, 2010, Lead Plaintiff filed his opposition to Defendants' motion to

dismiss [Docket No. 66], and on March 24, 2010, Defendants jointly filed a reply brief [Docket No. 67]. 7. On April 2, 2010, the Court issued a minute order [Docket No. 68] stating that

Defendants' motion to dismiss was submitted without oral argument and canceling the hearing scheduled for April 5, 2010; 8. On June 10, 2010, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

the FACC without prejudice [Docket No. 71]; 9. On June 15, 2010, the Court issued a Minute Order setting the Case Management

Conference for September 20, 2010; 10. 11. 12. Lead Plaintiff intends to file a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint ("SACC"); Lead Plaintiff's SACC is currently due on June 24, 2010; The parties have agreed upon a mutually acceptable schedule for the filing of the

SACC and the briefing and hearing for any subsequent motion to dismiss the SACC filed by Defendants. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among the undersigned counsel for the parties, that: 1. Lead Plaintiff will file and serve its Second Amended Consolidated Complaint

("SACC") on or before July 12, 2010; 2. 3. Defendants will move to dismiss the SACC on or before August 13, 2010; Lead Plaintiff will file and serve any papers in opposition to Defendants' motion to -2CASE NO. 2:09-CV-01610-GEB-KJN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING SACC AND RESPONSE THERETO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

dismiss the SACC on or before September 10, 2010; 4. Defendants will file and serve any reply papers in support of their motion to dismiss

on or before October 1, 2010; and 5. A hearing on Defendants motion to dismiss the SACC will be held on October 25,

2010 at 9:00 a.m., or at such other time as is convenient for the Court.

DATED: June __, 2010

MCGRANE GREENFIELD LLP By:

Christopher D. Sullivan Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: June __, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP By:

Kevin P. Muck Attorneys for Defendant ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP

DATED: June __, 2010

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA By:

Jeffrey A. Rich Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK

I certify that a true copy of the foregoing was served electronically via the CM/ECF system on all counsel of record on this ___ day of June, 2010.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING SACC AND RESPONSE THERETO

-3-

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-01610-GEB-KJN

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING SACC AND RESPONSE THERETO

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Lead Plaintiff will file and serve its Second Amended Consolidated Complaint

("SACC") on or before July 12, 2010; 2. 3. Defendants will move to dismiss the SACC on or before August 13, 2010; Lead Plaintiff will file and serve any papers in opposition to Defendants' motion to

dismiss the SACC on or before September 10, 2010; 4. Defendants will file and serve any reply papers in support of their motion to dismiss

on or before October 1, 2010; and 5. A hearing on Defendants motion to dismiss the SACC will be held on October 18,

2010 at 9:00 a.m., or at such other time as is convenient for the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 18, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

-5-

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-01610-GEB-KJN