Vang v. v. Hudson, et al.,

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/2/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 41 are ADOPTED IN FULL; dft SHRA's motion to dismiss 5 is GRANTED; pltf's claims against dft SHRA are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and dft SHRA is DISMISSED from this action; and this action shall proceed only on pltf's claims against dft Hudson and dft City Building Code Enforcement Department. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. LUELLA HUDSON, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 16, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within seven days after being served with the findings and recommendations. The seven-day period has expired, and no party has filed an objection to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. ///// ///// 1 ORDER MAI VANG, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1621 MCE DAD PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2010 (Doc. No. 41) are adopted in full; 2. Defendant SHRA's June 17, 2009 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is granted; 3. Plaintiff's claims against defendant SHRA are dismissed with prejudice, and defendant SHRA is dismissed from this action; and 4. This action shall proceed only on plaintiff's claims against defendant Hudson and defendant City Building Code Enforcement Department. Dated: April 2, 2010 ________________________________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?