Hollis v. Gorby et al

Filing 150

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/6/2013 AFFIRMING 144 Order. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. 2:09-cv-1627 JAM CKD P

A. GORBY, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

On March 4, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

17

judge’s order filed February 26, 2013 granting defendants’ motion for leave to depose Eileen

18

Searcy and permission to offer a video recording of the deposition into evidence at trial.

19

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

20

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

21

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

/////

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

2

magistrate judge filed February 26, 2013, is affirmed.

3

DATED: March 6, 2013

4
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2