Clark v. California State Prison Solano Medical Care System et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/6/09 DENYING 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. ///// ///// ///// 1 ORDER vs. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SOLANO MEDICAL CARE SYSTEM, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEROME DONALD CLARK, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1638 WBS GGH P 1 2 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 22, 2009, request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 17) is denied. DATED: October 6, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 GGH:kly clar1638.31 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?