Bardo v. Subia et al
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/18/10 denying 38 Motion for mandatory disclosure. (Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
(PC) Bardo v. Subia, et al
Doc. 40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
bar1645.ord
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT J. BARDO, Plaintiff, vs. SUBIA, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 8, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for mandatory disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. On November 10, 2010, defendants filed an opposition to this motion. Defendants correctly observe that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(B)(iv), an action brought without an attorney by a person in custody is exempt from the initial disclosure requirements of Rule 26. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for mandatory disclosure (Dkt. No. 38) is denied. DATED: November 18, 2010 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
Dockets.Justia.com
No. 2: 09-cv-1645 FCD KJN P
ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
