Gerow et al v. Homeq Servicing et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/7/2009 GRANTING 26 Stipulation and Request for Order to further extend time to respond to first amended complaint. (Matson, R)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Edward P. Sangster (SBN 121041) [e-mail] Rachel Chatman (SBN 206775) [e-mail] K&L GATES LLP 4 Embarcadero Ctr., Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants EquiFirst Corporation, HomEq Servicing and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES H. GEROW and CAROLYN FIGUEIRA-GEROW, Plaintiff, v. HOMEQ SERVICING, EQUIFIRST CORPORATION, T.D. SERVICE COMPANY, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., UNITED MORTGAGE AND REALTY SOLUTIONS, INC., BRIANNA WATERS, DAVID MICHAEL RISSE, and DOES 1 through 200, inclusive, Defendants.

Case No. 09-CV-01659-MCE-GGH

JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Complaint Filed: June 15, 2009 Trial Date: None Set

Gerow v. HOMEQ Servicing, et al. 1 Printed on Recycled Paper Case No. 09-CV-01659-MCE-GGH JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiffs James H. Gerow and Carolyn Figueira-Gerow (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants EquiFirst Corporation, HomEq Servicing and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request that this court issue an order to allow Defendants an extension to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs informed Defendants of their intent to file a Second Amended Complaint and accordingly Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed that Defendants must file an answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint by November 30, 2009, or thirty days after Plaintiffs file their Second Amended Complaint, whichever is earlier Dated: September 30, 2009 K&L GATES LLP

/s/ Rachel Chatman Attorneys for Defendants EQUIFIRST CORPORATION, HOMEQ SERVICING, and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. Dated: September 30, 2009 LANAHAN & REILLEY

By:

By:

/s/ Michael J.M. Brook Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES H. GEROW and CAROLYN FIGUEIRA-GEROW

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 7, 2009 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Gerow v. HOMEQ Servicing, et al. 2 Printed on Recycled Paper Case No. 09-CV-01659-MCE-GGH JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT