Mendoza v. Cate

Filing 122

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/27/2017 GRANTING 117 Motion for Extension of Time and GRANTING 120 Motion for Extension of Time. 118 Respondent's objections deemed timely filed. Petitioner's reply to Respondent's objections due on or before 1/29/2018. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DB P ORDER v. MATTHEW CATE, 14 Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ of 17 18 19 20 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 14, 2017, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations to grant the petition. (ECF No. 116.) Both parties have now filed requests for extension of time to file their response to the findings and recommendations. 21 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Respondent’s November 27, 2017, motion for extension of time (ECF No. 117) is 23 GRANTED. Respondent’s December 11, 2017, objections (ECF No. 118) are deemed 24 timely filed; and 25 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 3 2. Petitioner’s December 17, 2017, motion for extension of time (ECF No. 120) is GRANTED. Petitioner’s reply to Respondent’s objections is due on or before January 29, 2018. 4 Dated: December 27, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 /DLB7; DB/Inbox/Routine/mendoza1710.eot 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?